| 1 | /** @page rationale Rationale |
|---|
| 2 | |
|---|
| 3 | @section code_size Focus on code size |
|---|
| 4 | |
|---|
| 5 | The program options library has two important properties: |
|---|
| 6 | - runtime performance is not important. After all, command line processing |
|---|
| 7 | is done only once, and the amount of data is small. |
|---|
| 8 | - code size matters. Since parsing command line is utility task, users |
|---|
| 9 | won't be glad to have lots of code linked to every binary which has |
|---|
| 10 | options. |
|---|
| 11 | |
|---|
| 12 | For the above reasons, the the library is designed so that it can be easily |
|---|
| 13 | used as shared library, with minimum code on the side of main application. |
|---|
| 14 | In particular, templates are used only where necessary, for example for |
|---|
| 15 | validation of user-defined types. In other places, boost::function is |
|---|
| 16 | used to allow customization, but keep templates out of the public |
|---|
| 17 | interface. |
|---|
| 18 | |
|---|
| 19 | @section string_vs_enums Strings vs. enums |
|---|
| 20 | |
|---|
| 21 | In some places, the library uses strings to convey information that |
|---|
| 22 | could be represented by enumerations or values. For example, |
|---|
| 23 | the program_options::option_description class allows to add "?" to the |
|---|
| 24 | parameter name to specify that the parameter is optional. For another |
|---|
| 25 | example, while program_options::cmdline class allows to obtain the |
|---|
| 26 | index of option, it does not require to specify an index for each option, |
|---|
| 27 | and it's possible to tell options by their names. |
|---|
| 28 | |
|---|
| 29 | Such interface appears to be much more usable. If we were using |
|---|
| 30 | enumeration for different properties of parameter, there would be |
|---|
| 31 | another argument to many functions, the need to type long, possible |
|---|
| 32 | qualified names, and little advantage. |
|---|
| 33 | |
|---|
| 34 | That little advantage is that if you type a wrong enumeration name, |
|---|
| 35 | you'd get a compile error. If you type '!' instead of '?' after parameter |
|---|
| 36 | name, you'd get incorrect behaviour. However, such errors are deemed |
|---|
| 37 | rare. |
|---|
| 38 | |
|---|
| 39 | @section char_vs_string const char* vs. std::string |
|---|
| 40 | |
|---|
| 41 | Most of the interface uses const char* where std::string seems a natural |
|---|
| 42 | choice. The reason is that those functions are called many times: for |
|---|
| 43 | example to declare all options. They are typically called with string |
|---|
| 44 | literals, and implicit conversion to string appears to take a lot of |
|---|
| 45 | code space. Providing both std::string and const char* version would |
|---|
| 46 | considerably bloat the interface. Since passing std::string is considered |
|---|
| 47 | rare, only const char* versions are provided. |
|---|
| 48 | |
|---|
| 49 | @section init_syntax Initialization syntax |
|---|
| 50 | |
|---|
| 51 | The syntax used for creating options_description instance was designed to |
|---|
| 52 | be as easy as possible in the most common case. Consider: |
|---|
| 53 | @code |
|---|
| 54 | desc.add_options() |
|---|
| 55 | ("verbose", "", "verbosity level") |
|---|
| 56 | ("magic", "int", "magic value").notify(some_func) |
|---|
| 57 | ; |
|---|
| 58 | @endcode |
|---|
| 59 | Here, most common properties of options: name, presense of parameter and |
|---|
| 60 | description, are specified very concisely, and additional properties can |
|---|
| 61 | be given quite naturally, too. |
|---|
| 62 | |
|---|
| 63 | Another possibility would be: |
|---|
| 64 | @code |
|---|
| 65 | option_description d1(...), d2(...); |
|---|
| 66 | desc.add(d1 & d2); |
|---|
| 67 | @endcode |
|---|
| 68 | or |
|---|
| 69 | @code |
|---|
| 70 | option_description d1(...), d2(...); |
|---|
| 71 | desc = d1, d2; |
|---|
| 72 | @endcode |
|---|
| 73 | |
|---|
| 74 | The drawback is the need to explicitly create new objects and give names |
|---|
| 75 | to them. The latter problem can be helped if objects are created inside |
|---|
| 76 | expressions: |
|---|
| 77 | @code |
|---|
| 78 | desc = option_description(...), option_description(...) |
|---|
| 79 | @endcode |
|---|
| 80 | but there's still extra typing. |
|---|
| 81 | |
|---|
| 82 | @section help_handling Handling of --help |
|---|
| 83 | |
|---|
| 84 | It was suggested by Gennadiy Rozental that occurence of <tt>--help</tt> |
|---|
| 85 | on command line results in throwing an exception. Actually, the |
|---|
| 86 | "special" option must have been configurable. This was not |
|---|
| 87 | implemented, because applications might reasonable want to process |
|---|
| 88 | the rest of command line even of <tt>--help</tt> was seen. For example, |
|---|
| 89 | <tt>--verbose</tt> option can control how much help should be output, |
|---|
| 90 | or there may be several subcommand with different help screens. |
|---|
| 91 | |
|---|
| 92 | |
|---|
| 93 | |
|---|
| 94 | |
|---|
| 95 | */ |
|---|